Small fruit, high count, and labour as the deciding cost

Cherry tomato is a separate market class from truss, sold both on the vine and loose, and priced on flavour and appearance rather than on weight alone. The fruit is small, so a house produces a very large number of them for a given tonnage, and picking and packing become the dominant variable cost. That is the crop’s central commercial tension: the premium is real, and so is the labour required to capture it.

What the crop needs

The plant is long-cycle on substrate and high wire, like truss tomato, but it carries a much larger number of smaller fruit. Plant load management is therefore the daily craft, and the balance between vegetative and generative growth has to be held tightly to keep sugar levels and fruit size consistent across a long season. Climate and irrigation strategy are directed at flavour and shelf life as much as at total mass.

What is not established

Cherry tomato is a provisional crop in the model: ranges are published, never a bare number. Dutch light-use figures circulating for this class are grower rules of thumb rather than released yield constants, and the model does not treat them as transferable. Cultivar, fruit load, whether the crop is sold on the vine or loose, and the quality specification all have to be calibrated on the project before a yield can be projected.

DutchGreenhouses® specifies the structure, climate, screening and irrigation around the cherry tomato crop, its sale form and the local climate, so flavour and count hold across the season. Get in touch to plan a tomato greenhouse for your market.

Questions

Cherry tomato, asked and answered

Is cherry tomato more profitable than truss?

It carries a higher price per kilogram and a higher labour cost per kilogram. Which wins depends on local labour rates, the degree of harvest and pack automation, and the premium the market actually pays.

Can the truss tomato climate recipe be used for cherry?

The species-level climate recipe is shared, but plant load, harvest interval and saleable yield are not. Treating the two as one crop is where yield projections go wrong.

What decides cherry tomato flavour?

Cultivar sets the ceiling; climate, irrigation strategy and plant load decide how close a crop gets to it. Flavour is steered before harvest, not after.

Crop data

Cherry tomatoes — reference values

Reference values from the DutchGreenhouses crop model, each traced to its Dutch source below. Ranges describe published practice across systems and seasons; a project setpoint is calculated for the actual greenhouse, crop and climate.

Day climateMedium confidence12345

Air temperature
19–23 °C
Relative humidity
82–88 %
Vapour-pressure deficit
0.28–0.45 kPa
Daily light integral
18–35 mol/m²/d
Photoperiod
16–18 h
CO₂ concentration
600–800 ppm
Root-zone temperature
17–20 °C

Night climateMedium confidence1367

Air temperature
17–20 °C
Relative humidity
85–90 %
Vapour-pressure deficit
0.2–0.34 kPa
CO₂ concentration
420–500 ppm
Root-zone temperature
17–20 °C

Irrigation and root zoneMedium confidence68910

Supply EC
3.5–4.5 mS/cm
Supply pH
5–6.2 pH
Drain fraction
20–30 %
Daily water use
1–5 L/m²/d
Dosing capacity
≈ 2 L/m²/h

Where these come from

  1. Kas als Energiebron, 2020 — Lit tomato crop timing and lighting. University/extension · High confidence · E015One Dutch full-LED trial; cultivar and planting date apply.
  2. Kas als Energiebron Academy Tomaat, 2023 — Radiation–temperature ratio (RTR). University/extension · Medium confidence · E016A practice method and participant example, not a universal optimum.
  3. Kas als Energiebron / Delphy, 2022 — Energy-efficient LED temperature and humidity. University/extension · High confidence · E017Observed successful trial conditions; not proof that RH values are universal optima.
  4. Kas als Energiebron / WUR, 2014 — Tomato CO₂ operating range. University/extension · High confidence · E023Economic and ventilation context still changes the optimal dose.
  5. Kas als Energiebron project 20184 — Modern full-LED tomato project configuration. University/extension · High confidence · E029Demonstration configuration; installed capacity is not a universal crop optimum.
  6. Kas als Energiebron / Delphy, 2025 — Humidity, EC and transpiration under LED. University/extension · Medium confidence · E018Interim results; final minimum-transpiration guidance was not yet published.
  7. WUR / del Amor & Marcelis, 2005 — Humidity response and nutrient uptake. Peer-reviewed · Medium confidence · E022Controlled-condition mechanism; not a mature commercial recipe.
  8. Proefstation voor Tuinbouw onder Glas / WUR, 1994 — Closed-system tomato nutrient solution. University/extension · Medium confidence · E021Authoritative Dutch basis but old; modern root-volume and cultivar effects require monitoring.
  9. WUR / Li, Stanghellini & Challa, 2001 — Tomato EC × transpiration response. Peer-reviewed · Medium confidence · E027High-salinity experiment; use for risk response, not the normal operating setpoint.
  10. Kas als Energiebron, 2023 — Nutrition under lower transpiration. University/extension · Medium confidence · E028Supports a feedback strategy rather than a static nutrient recipe.

These are reference values, not a specification. DutchGreenhouses does not publish project setpoints; those are calculated per greenhouse, crop and location.

From the knowledge base

Reads you might find interesting