# Carbon Footprint

> Part of: [Performance & Outcomes](/performance.md) · Provider: [DutchGreenhouses](/)

A greenhouse burns gas for two products at once: heat the crop needs at night and carbon dioxide it needs by day. Decarbonising the heat therefore removes an enrichment supply the crop depended on, which is why emissions and yield cannot be addressed separately.

## Facts
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Dutch sector emission per square metre | 37 kg CO₂/m² |
| Binding 2030 residual-emission target | 4.3 Mton CO₂-eq |
| Share of sector energy supply already carbon-free | 26 % |
| The structural complication | Flue gas is a crop input constraint |
| Honest metric | Per kilogram, not per square metre basis |

Performance

# Carbon.

    The boiler feeds the crop. That is what makes this hard.

## Why this is not the same problem as decarbonising a building

## Where the sector stands

Dutch greenhouse cultivation put out around 37 kg of CO₂ per square metre in 2024, temperature-corrected.

About a quarter of the sector’s energy supply is already carbon-free, and the binding target is 4.3 megatonnes of residual emissions by 2030.

The direction is not in doubt. The difficulty is in a place most people do not look.

## The greenhouse eats its own exhaust

Burn gas and you get two things the crop wants.

Heat, which it needs at night. And carbon dioxide, which it needs by day — dosed to around 800 ppm, and worth real yield.

A buffer tank exists precisely to reconcile those two demands: burn in daylight for the CO₂, store the heat, release it after dark.

So take the burner away and you have not just changed the heat source. You have removed a crop input. That gap has to be filled from somewhere else, and the cost of filling it belongs in the same calculation.

This is the bit that generic decarbonisation advice misses entirely.

## Cut demand first. It is cheaper and it is neutral.

Screens and the covering shrink the heat requirement before any source decision is made.

That makes insulation the cheapest carbon measure as well as the cheapest energy one — and unlike a fuel switch, it does not take the CO₂ supply away with it.

Then geothermal through a heat exchanger, a heat pump, or electric heat decide the emissions of whatever demand is left.

## Insist on the per-kilo number

A greenhouse can improve its emissions per square metre by growing less. The reported figure gets better and the business gets worse.

Per kilo of produce, temperature-corrected. That is the only version worth putting in front of a customer or a lender, and it is the version DutchGreenhouses® models.

Get in touch with your crop, your climate and your energy prices, and we will show you what the routes actually cost.

From the knowledge base

## Reads you might find interesting

### Grow Like a Pro: Starting Smart, Growing Strong

          How Grow Like a Pro combines smart farming, CEA technology and local partnerships for eco-friendly, profitable, pesticide-free greenhouse pr

          Read article

### The Case for a College Greenhouse

          Why a college greenhouse belongs in the curriculum: teaching science, craftsmanship, business logic and sustainability, and preparing studen

          Read article

### The Case for a High School Greenhouse

          Why every high school greenhouse matters: how it makes STEM tangible, builds responsibility and teamwork, and helps students discover their

          Read article

### Greenhouses in Education: The Case for Schools

          Greenhouses in education reconnect students to reality — the full case for why every school, high school, college and trade program should h

          Read article

### The Origins of Greenhouse Horticulture: My Backyard

          A tour through greenhouse horticulture history: from 19th-century Westland fruit walls to the “City of Glass” and today’s international high

          Read article

### DutchGreenhouses Rebranded: A New Corporate Identity

          Announcing our new corporate identity — a visual style reflecting our dedication to advanced, high-quality greenhouse projects and The Futur

          Read article

## FAQ
**What is a greenhouse's carbon footprint?**
Dutch greenhouse cultivation emitted around 37 kilograms of carbon dioxide per square metre in 2024, temperature-corrected, and roughly a quarter of the sector's energy supply is already carbon-free. The sector works to a binding target of 4.3 megatonnes of residual emissions by 2030.

**Why is decarbonising a greenhouse harder than decarbonising a building?**
Because the combustion product is a crop input. Burning gas yields heat the crop needs at night and carbon dioxide it needs by day, and enrichment to around 800 parts per million is worth real yield. Removing the burner removes an enrichment supply that then has to be sourced externally.

**What reduces emissions first?**
Demand, before source. Screens and the covering shrink the heat requirement, which makes insulation the cheapest carbon measure as well as the cheapest energy one. Geothermal, heat pumps and electric heat then decide the emissions of whatever demand remains.

**How should a carbon figure be compared?**
Per kilogram of produce rather than per square metre alone, and temperature-corrected. A facility can lower its emissions per square metre simply by growing less, which improves the reported number and nothing else.

## Related
[Performance & Outcomes](/performance.md) · [Energy Use](/performance/energy-use.md) · [Heating](/climate/heating.md) · [CO2 Enrichment](/climate/co2-enrichment.md) · [Energy Screens](/screening/energy-screens.md) · [Geothermal Energy](/glossary/geothermal-energy.md) · [Heat Pump](/glossary/heat-pump.md) · [CHP (Combined Heat and Power)](/glossary/chp-cogeneration.md)

## See also
https://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_19b43ce1